| of the message without confusion or doubt. They who believe must hold to the fact of the story account. The best that could be declared about our belief is the statement that there is a God. The thought is a possibility each should consider about the life.
The story fact states we are the children of God. This fact about the story we should know. We are family. So with all these things known what is the problem The problem is the story states a reality we can not disclose. We all pride ourselves in self acclaimed glory. The diversity of our family has its division even in a single household. The worshippers of the world cut of its division magnify the complexity. The story meaning not perceive has not formed into our hearts. God has a role in the story. Angel has their role in the story. So do adam in the account of the story. If we take the story for its face value, what makes our truth right beyond the stated ideals of others We must expose this indifference to assure our way to that glory of God. In the sequence of events detailed in the story are we the cheerleaders on the sideline rather then the players on the field. The son that talks about what he can do in comparison to the son who did. We have a need to examine the ritual performances we illustrate to honor God. We need to define what is this act we do in the name of God The words spoken that the story states lack that knowledge of God The story denies that this act we do is the truth of God. First we have to find the path that leads to the way to God.
The truth about the story of God has to start with its beginning. Adam states this beginning centered on the fact of the earth. The thought of this fact is mere vanity. The story relates the acts of angel. The story states God appointment of angels to watch over adam. The story states angel journey with adam throughout the account history. The story of God concludes with the punishment of angel and adam. We all have these facts stated about the story account. Even with these statements we fail to relate the whole thought conveyed about the account. In our definition we forget the host of angel there at this start of the earth. The beginning with angel starts this fact of the story. With this confrontation on this beginning is our lack of its stated fact. We can stay in the darkness of our self proclaimed awareness. Or we can perceive that we could not see about the story account. So I will lay the first brick to this foundation. I have a question pertained to the initial statements of the creation. The question is who is telling this account of the creation
I through my own study understand the fact that Moses related these details of the creation story. Moses gave this statement by God or angel about the start of the world of adam. This is the first brick to the foundation of discerning the story account. The thought is the one who told Moses about the creation. We know there are two Lords in the story account. David made this fact clear. David who was a Lord spoke of his Lord that turn to another Lord. The story of Moses holds the fact of God on the mountain but also an angel in a flaming bush. The story states no man has ever seen God. The story states that no man has heard God voice either. The story states God in the Garden of Eden appointed one to be God. These facts ignite the flow and reality to be known of the story account. The beginning of adam creation starts before there was a garden or a earth. There at that moment was one God. God appointment of a fill in God to watch adam holds the journey from the garden to our current state. Jesus states God worked six days and on the seventh day he worked in His stead. Jesus relates Moses wrote of him. That he knew Abraham as well. The thought coming full circle to one told fact about that beginning. This beginning of adam starts in the world of angel.
Listening to fellow believers I have come to discern an indifference to the teller of the creation account. Most discern the initial statement as God proclaiming His act of the heaven and the earth creation. This is fine except the and God said mentioned in the story account. The and God said could be the thoughts of Moses to the blind. Or the and God said could be the conveyed fact given to Moses by the angel. The believer doesnt have to get lost in the array of views. The sequence in the account suggests its fact to that account. The let us make man in the creation account reflects the world of angel. The world of angel was made before the world of adam. God made the world of angel as He had made the world of adam. Both angel and adam made in that likeness and image of God. The fact of adam not there in the state of the existence to relate these acts of creation about God is the truth. God was not alone and these acts of creation were in the state of angel domain. Religion concepts of this defined act start with God state in nothingness. The fact of angel relates this account start in the world of its host. My concern is the proper and improper illustrations of the creation acts by God. Adam concept of God is in a state of a dark void and angel state of Him in abundance.
Here is the first brick to the foundation. The act of this deception rooted in the host of angel prior to the creation of the earth. The logic of such a statement places a thought outside the known fit of our awareness. The ideals of a world not part of God immediate or the created state of the earth. The truth is the real value of anything we state to the story account. If the fact doesnt relate the reality disclosed in the story account we need to remove that lie. God doesnt take the lie as part of His worship.
May we all grow in the wisdom and prosperity of God will,
Alexander Coppedge
TPAC manager
www.tpacmindfood.com
About The Author
Alexander Coppedge
Im a self-motivated researcher of the testament of the Holy Scriptures. I spent most of my life, some thirty years, exploring the statements of the account. This article exploration of the Bible is outside the guidance and practices of the religious community. To my surprise an overwhelming indifference between the religious community and my own interpretation of the scriptures account. I found great interest in the defined creation of the earth account. The expressed views of the religious community against my own interpreted account, I found interesting. It's this desire which promotes this article to express to others a need to open debate about our views about God.
This article was posted on December 08, 2005 |
